|
1980- . :
,
1950- 1960- . ,
. ,
F-104O "" - F-4F ""2, - F-4K/M
"", - F-104S G-91. ,
, ,
F-16.
, , , -
,
, . ,
, , , ,
,
-
.
. ,
-106,
"", .
= 1,8, 10 ,
400 . -106
"", ,
. , -106, 1981 .
,
.
, -106.
TKF, "",
""
. "" ND102,
().
-. 1983 .
, . "",
F-404.
.
: ,
, , ,
, ,
- , .
1981 . (), () ()
,
,
. , 1982 .,
"" - ,
(Agile Combat Aircraft - ). ,
1989 .
"". , ,
= 2, ,
.
,
"" ( ,
- RB199 8800 , 1,2).
1983 .
: 16 , , ,
,
FEFA (Future European Fighter Aircraft -
-). EFA.
- .
DASA (), (), (), - ()
AS ().
-
.
,
,
1.
EFA 1984 .
1986 .
"" , .
.
"" ,
.
,
, 30%
35%.
,
.
EFA
. ,
1960-80- .,
. .
EFA ,
, "".
.
DASS (Defense Aids Sub System),
-
, .
,
, ,
, .
, ,
, , "", F-15, F-16
F/A-18.
EFA -
.
, ,
, .
1985 .
"". -
: - 33%
( 250 ), - 21% (200 )
- 13% (100 ).
. , -
. , - . .
EFA
.
1986 . ,
-, MTU, .
EJ200.
1980- . EFA
: , , .
,
, .
EFA ;
F-16 F/A-18,
.
EFA -
" " (Experimental Aircraft Program),
1983 . . 1986
. EFA, "",
, .
.
.
,
.
: 76%, - 7% - 17%.
1988 .
EFA
, ,
, 53*. ,
, ,
, .
.
,
, .
.
.
,
. ,
-29
, ,
EFA. - ,
. ,
,
F-15, F-16 F/A-18.
EFA. 1992 .
- EFA. "
,
",
- 2000 . - 2002 .
2000 2035 . - EF2000.
, , ,
-, -
-.
,
-. , ,
, " ,
,
".
.
,
12-30%. ,
.
, - .
: ,
,
, . ,
,
.
607 : 250 , 140 , 130
87 .
:
, -
, CASA, .
- 7-10 .
27 1994 . DASA
, ,
N 1 EF2000, DA1.
, DA2, . N 3 7
, N 4 - - -
. .
N 5 ,
ECR 90, a N 6 - . N 3
.
1995 .,
1994 . 1995 .
EJ200 (
- RB199). 4500
, 4000 .
800 , ,
- . ,
, (),
, , .
, 111.
850 . . .
,
. EFA/EF2000 .
, ,
, , "
". ,
, EF2000.
, EF2000 ,
( DASS ),
-29, ,
.
EF2000,
""
36 .
EF2000
30-33 20%. ,
, 30%
.
- ( EF2000
). ,
, , ,
, .
EF2000 2002 .
-29,
- F-4F, "
" AN/APG-65, MIL STD
1553, -124, ,
AIM-120 AMRAAM (
2 . ).
AMRAAM ,
F-4F . " -
"
"". ,
. -29
. ,
:
-
F-4F ,
70 "" ,
;
-
( 36
), EF2000
;
-
EF2000 ( 2006
.), 140 100.
-29
( " "),
EF2000 1,8 .
12 . .
,
.
-29 60 . .
1997 . 12 . 1994 .
100 -29
(80 . ). 20 . .
,
-29,
. -29,
F-1S, F-16, F/A-18 SAAB
JAS-39.
() 5-10
- F-15 F-16. 24
F-15C 265-530 . . (
),
F-16 145-265 . .
F-16C 50 20 .
. .
F-15, F-16 F/A-18. ,
EF2000
-27. ,
, "".
EF2000 ,
( Joust).
,
. -27 -35
( AMRAAM)
. , EF2000
, -27,
XXI ( ,
).
,
, EF2000, ,
"" .
, EF2000
F-22
, F-22 .
, ,
"-94", -35 82%
EF2000 (
, F-22A 91%,
"" - 60%, F-15E - 50%, F/A-18E - 35%, -29 - 32% F-16C - 21%).
, EF2000
-29, ,
-29 EF2000,
.
<1 EF2000 "", -35 F-16C
(, , ),
-29, F/A-18E F-15E.
>1 EF2000,
( ) "", F-16C, -35, -29, F-15E F/A-18E.
, F-16C, "", -35, F-15E, -29 F/A-18E.
, ,
EF2000 ,
(
DASS, ),
-29. , ,
, .
. ,
, . ,
EF2000 ,
, . ,
, EF2000 -29
,
. , EF2000
1,02, -29
- 1,12 - 1,26 (, ,
).
EF2000 300 /, -29 - 310 /,
2,0 2,3,
-29 . -35 (,
, )
- ,
.
, -35
.
,
EF2000 ,
F-22A
, EF2000 .
- ,
, ,
.
, ,
EF2000 ,
. , ,
- ,
,
.
. , EF2000
,
, .
,
EF2000 ,
, ,
, EF2000.
,
. ,
, "
". ,
,
-,
.
.
"-1" -
2003 . 2004 EF-2000 ""
. 148
EF-2000 "" "-1".
EF-2000 . 2015 ""
148, 236 236 . ( 620 EF-2000 "")
- (232 - , 180 - , 121 -
87 - ). 2002
18
"-2" 1,95 (2,55 ). 2007
""
18 15 . "-2"
"-1". 72 ,
EF-2000 "" 707
6 . "-2"
- 14 2004 .
16 2008 . "",
60 "-2".
NETMA
, .
.
"-2" "-1"
, , ,
"-". "-3"
- NETMA. ,
236 "-3" 2008 - 2009 .
"-3" 2013
. , "" "-3" ,
, ,
, .
EF2000.
""
,
. 40% , 20% -
- "" (Al-Li 8090), 18% - , 12% -
10% - . 70%
, 12%, - 15%,
- 3%. ,
9999 .
- , "".
6000 .
, ,
,
.
53 , 2,2.
( )
( ),
. (
, - )
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
, 2,40 2.
, .
, - .
.
,
, , 500 , 700 .
.
EF2000 - RB199-122
(2 7260 ), "".
EJ200 (2
9200 ).
EJ200 -
. ,
, ,
.
.
. 900
.
,
(
), .
, .
:
1000 () 1500 .
.
,
30% , . 1 10
.- ( : F/A-18
27,5 .-). EF2000
45 . 1000
400 ( F/A-18 - 1012 ).
()
, .
,
( ),
.
- ECR90 PIRATE.
ECR90 -,
GEC-, , FIAR
INISEJL ,
.
" ",
" " FRS.2.
, ,
- .
,
.
,
,
.
PIRATE , 1992 .
(Eurofirst) FIAR (), -1
() ().
.
.
,
, ,
, - ,
. , .
9 6
.
EF2000
, -, ,
,
,
.
(Total Terrain Avionics)
.
DASS -
, , -
,
, ,
( , )
.
(
, , ).
13 .
- AIM-120 AMRAAM, "" (
) "" ( ),
, AIM-9
"" ASRAAM .
- 10,
18 140 (40000 ).
. 27- .
6500
, - .
1000 , -
325 - -
1000 . -
3 15 .
.
-
().
. .
,
.
- 16
, .
- 18
. ,
.
,
.
, F-16, F-22 -35, EF2000
,
GEC . -29 EF2000
" ",
( , ,
, , ).
,
.
GEC ,
. -
, ,
, ASRAAM.
.
, ,
. ,
.
.
,
. ,
.
. , ,
.
Dr Lomp The Cleaning Verified Review
Based on the information available, there is no widely recognized product, software feature, or official protocol specifically named "Dr. Lomp the Cleaning Verified."
- Expand any section into more detail with citations.
- Write a shorter consumer guide or a product comparison table.
- Draft a review format you can use for specific Dr Lomp products.
Spam or bot-generated text
– Sometimes random strings of words like this appear in captchas, comment sections, or test messages. dr lomp the cleaning verified
“Marco,” Dr. Lomp said, not unkindly. “The men’s room by the freight elevator. You missed a spot.” Based on the information available, there is no
Verify Credentials:
Always ask if the company is insured and what their "re-clean" policy is if you aren't satisfied. Red Flags to Watch Out For Even when searching for verified professionals, be wary of: Expand any section into more detail with citations
Standard cleaning uses a one-size-fits-all chemical approach. The Dr. Lomp method uses a layered system:
. 2008
 |