Rijal Al Kashi Report 176 ((better)) Online

Overview — Rijal al-Kashi (Rijāl al-Kāshī) and "Report 176"

The significance of Report 176 has been debated across centuries by "Rijali" experts such as Al-Najashi and Shaykh al-Tusi.

The Language

: The report uses strong cautionary language, suggesting that Zurarah’s prominence did not exempt him from the Imam's correction or disapproval. Scholarly Interpretation Rijal Al Kashi Report 176

Example (hypothetical reconstruction)

• Entry 176 (example): “Muḥammad ibn X, kunya Abū Y; from Kūfa; narrated from A and to B; described by al‑Kāshī as majhūl — other sources (Najjāshī: taʿdīl; al‑Tūsi: weak); no extant works; died circa 200 AH.”
  Use: If this person appears in a chain, a researcher would note conflicting evaluations and search for corroborating chains, text-critical indicators, and external historical data to decide on the hadith’s standing.

Scholars debate the nomenclature. Some say it refers to the year 176 AH (792 CE)—a pivotal year of political transition between the Umayyad and Abbasid shadow wars. Others claim it is simply the shelf number: Row 1, Shelf 7, Volume 6. Overview — Rijal al-Kashi (Rijāl al-Kāshī) and "Report

Critical Note