In EUREQA, every question is constructed through an implicit reasoning chain. The chain is constructed by parsing DBPedia. Each layer comprises three components: an entity, a fact about the entity, and a relation between the entity
and its counterpart from the next layer. The layers stack up to create chains with different depths of reasoning. We verbalize reasoning chains into natural sentences and anonymize the entity of each layer to create the question.
Questions can be solved layer by layer and each layer is guaranteed a unique answer. EUREQA is not a knowledge game: we adopt a knowledge filtering process that ensures that most LLMs have sufficient world knowledge to answer our questions.
EUREQA comprises a total of 2,991 questions of different reasoning depths and difficulties. The entities encompass a broad spectrum of topics, effectively reducing any potential bias arising from specific entity categories.
These data are great for analyzing the reasoning processes of LLMs
PerformanceHere we present the accuracy of ChatGPT, Gemini-Pro and GPT-4 on the hard set of EUREQA across different depths d of reasoning (number of layers in the questions). We evaluate two prompt strategies: direct zero-shot prompt and ICL with two examples. In general, with the entities recursively substituted by the descriptions of reasoning chaining layers, and therefore eliminating surface-level semantic cues, these models generate more incorrect answers. When the reasoning depth increases from one to five on hard questions, there is a notable decline in performance for all models. This finding underscores the significant impact that semantic shortcuts have on the accuracy of responses, and it also indicates that GPT-4 is considerably more capable of identifying and taking advantage of these shortcuts.
| depth | d=1 | d=2 | d=3 | d=4 | d=5 | |||||
| direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | direct | icl | |
| ChatGPT | 22.3 | 53.3 | 7.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 39.2 | 3.7 | 39.3 | 7.2 | 39.0 |
| Gemini-Pro | 45.0 | 49.3 | 29.5 | 23.5 | 27.3 | 28.6 | 25.7 | 24.3 | 17.2 | 21.5 |
| GPT-4 | 60.3 | 76.0 | 50.0 | 63.7 | 51.3 | 61.7 | 52.7 | 63.7 | 46.9 | 61.9 |
Downloading music from unofficial platforms like Kuttywap is illegal, violating copyright laws and risking civil liability [10]. Such websites also pose significant cybersecurity threats, including malware and phishing scams, by providing unauthorized access to copyrighted content [10]. To support artists and ensure security, users should utilize legal streaming services like Amazon Music, JioSaavn, or Hungama for Tamil music. For secure and legal Tamil music, explore options on
The "free" tag came with significant hidden costs. Because the website did not sell a product or a subscription, its revenue was generated entirely through advertising. However, due to its illegal nature, legitimate advertisers (like Www.kuttywap.com Tamil Mp3 Songs Download
The website was a treasure trove of Tamil MP3 songs, with a vast collection of hits from the biggest stars in the industry. Karthik couldn't believe his eyes - from the latest chart-toppers to classic melodies, everything was available at his fingertips. He spent hours browsing through the site, downloading song after song. Downloading music from unofficial platforms like Kuttywap is
Some independent Tamil artists release music on or SoundCloud under free download options. However, for mainstream film music, legal free downloads are virtually nonexistent—streaming with ads is the standard free alternative. Spotify: Massive Tamil library, including old classics and
If you need help finding a legally, let me know the movie or song name—I’d be happy to guide you to official sources.
This website is adapted from Nerfies, UniversalNER and LLaVA, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. We thank the LLaMA team for giving us access to their models.
Usage and License Notices: The data abd code is intended and licensed for research use only. They are also restricted to uses that follow the license agreement of LLaMA, ChatGPT, and the original dataset used in the benchmark. The dataset is CC BY NC 4.0 (allowing only non-commercial use) and models trained using the dataset should not be used outside of research purposes.